A multi-criteria decision making approach to the new product development process in industry

Authors

  • Mohamed I. Youssef Institute of Public Administration, Saudi Arabia
  • Barry Webster Florida Institute of Technology, United States of America

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/rme2001260122y

Keywords:

Multi-criteria Decision Making, PROMETHEE Method, New Product Development

Abstract

New product development is the process of taking a new idea and turning that idea into an actual product, available on the market.  This process includes a number of stages, starting with the product concept and increasingly refining that concept until it becomes the final product and is ready for marketing. The primary function of a Multi-Criteria Decision Making approach is to take the values of a set of criteria and determine an optimal course of action.  This research aims to evaluate the significance of using such the PROMETHEE approach to formulate the new product development process within an organization. In order to use that approach to assess the level of improvement that the organization has seen in its performance in new product development, and to estimate the possible level of improvement that might take place if the organization implements suggested recommendations. A research case is studied in order to make this assessment.  Results of the case study are presented to demonstrate the feasibility of using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making approach for improving the new product development process within a real-world industrial setting.

References

Asghar, S., & Habiba, U. (2009). A Survey on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approaches. International Conference on Emerging Technologies (pp. 321-325). Islamabad: IEEE.

Brans, J. P., & Mareschal, B. (2005). PROMETHEE Methods. In J. P. Brans, & B. Mareschal, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys (pp. 163-186). New York: Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., & Mareschal, B. (1986). How to Select and How to Rank Projects: The PROMETHEE Method. European Journal of Operational Research, 228–238.

Hermans, C. M., & Erickson, J. D. (2007). Multicriteria Decision Analysis: Overview and Implications for Environmental Decision Making. Advances in the Economics of Environmental Resources, Vol. 7, 213-228.

Kasperczyk, N., & Knickel, K. (2011, September 29). Preference Ranking Organisation Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE). Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 09, 1-6.

Klauer, e. (2006). Multicriteria Analysis Under Uncertainty with IANUS - Method and Empirical Results. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 24, 235–256.

Kumar, S., & Phrommathed, P. (2005). New Product Development, An Empirical Study of the Effects of Innovation Strategy, Organization Learning, and Market Conditions. Minneapolis: Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

Mareschal, B. (2013). Visual PROMETHEE 1.3 Manual. Brussels: B. Mareschal.

Mareschal, B., & Brans, J. P. (1991). Bank Adviser. An Industrial Evaluation System. European Journal of Operational Research, 54, 318-324.

Pomerol, J.-C., & Barba-Romero, S. (2000). Multicriterion Decision in Management - Principles and Practice. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Yeh , e. (2013). Using a Hybrid MCDM Methodology to Identify Critical Factors in New Product Development. Neural Computing and Applications, 2013, 1-15.

Youssef, M. I., & Webster, B. (2013). A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach to the New Product Development Process in Industry. Melbourne: Florida Institute of Technology.

Published

2022-01-26

How to Cite

Youssef, M. I. ., & Webster , B. . (2022). A multi-criteria decision making approach to the new product development process in industry. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 3(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.31181/rme2001260122y