Risk analysis of cutting system under intuitionistic fuzzy environment

Authors

  • Dinesh Kumar Kushwaha Department of Industrial and production Engineering, Dr B R Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar, India
  • Dilbagh Panchal Department of Industrial and production Engineering, Dr B R Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar, India
  • Anish Sachdeva Department of Industrial and production Engineering, Dr B R Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/rme200101162k

Keywords:

Intuitionistic Fuzzy; FMEA; Cutting system; Availability; Maintenance schedule.

Abstract

Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) is popular and versatile approach applicable to risk assessment and safety improvement of a repairable engineering system. This method encompasses various fields such as manufacturing, healthcare, paper mill, thermal power industry, software industry, services, security etc. in terms of its application. In general, FMEA is based on Risk Priority Number (RPN) score which is found by product of probability of Occurrence (O), Severity of failure (S) and Failure Detection (D). As human judgement is approximate in nature, the accuracy of data obtained from FMEA members depend on degree of subjectivity. The subjective knowledge of members not only contains uncertainty but hesitation too which in turn, affect the results. Fuzzy FMEA considers uncertainty and vagueness of the data/ information obtained from experts. In order to take into account, the hesitation of experts and vague concept, in the present work we propose integrated framework based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy- Failure Mode Effect Analysis (IF-FMEA) and IF-Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IF-TOPSIS) techniques to rank the listed failure causes. Failure cause Fibrizer (FR) was found to be the most critical failure cause with RPN score 0.500. IF-TOPSIS has been implemented within IF-FMEA to compare and verify ranking results obtained by both the IF based approaches. The proposed method was presented with its application for examining the risk assessment of cutting system in sugar mill industry situated in western Uttar Pradesh province of India. The result would be useful for the plant maintenance manager to fix the best maintenance schedule for improving availability of cutting system.   

References

Atanassov, K. T. (2012). On intuitionistic fuzzy sets theory (Vol. 283). Springer.

Ali, Y., Mehmood, B., Huzaifa, M., Yasir, U., & Khan, A. U. (2020). Development of a new hybrid multi criteria decision-making method for a car selection scenario. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 18(3), 357-373.

Ahn, J., Noh, Y., Park, S. H., Choi, B. I., & Chang, D. (2017). Fuzzy-based failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) of a hybrid molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) and gas turbine system for marine propulsion. Journal of Power Sources, 364, 226-233.

Adar, E., İnce, M., Karatop, B., & Bilgili, M. S. (2017). The risk analysis by failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) and fuzzy-FMEA of supercritical water gasification system used in the sewage sludge treatment. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 5(1), 1261-1268.

Balaraju, J., Raj, M. G., & Murthy, C. S. (2019). Fuzzy-FMEA risk evaluation approach for LHD machine-A case study. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 18(4), 257-268.

Chang, K. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2010). A risk assessment methodology using intuitionistic fuzzy set in FMEA. International Journal of Systems Science, 41(12), 1457-1471.

Chu, T. C. (2002). Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 20(11), 859-864.

Daneshvar Rouyendegh, B., Yildizbasi, A., & Arikan, Ü. Z. (2018). Using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS in site selection of wind power plants in Turkey. Advances in Fuzzy Systems, 2018.

Efe, B. (2019). Analysis of operational safety risks in shipbuilding using failure mode and effect analysis approach. Ocean Engineering, 187, 106214.

Garg, H. (2014). Performance and behavior analysis of repairable industrial systems using Vague Lambda–Tau methodology. Applied Soft Computing, 22, 323-338.

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making (pp. 58-191). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Junior, F. R. L., Osiro, L., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2014). A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 21, 194-209.

Kang, J., Sun, L., Sun, H., & Wu, C. (2017). Risk assessment of floating offshore wind turbine based on correlation-FMEA. Ocean Engineering, 129, 382-388.

Lo, H. W., & Liou, J. J. (2018). A novel multiple-criteria decision-making-based FMEA model for risk assessment. Applied Soft Computing, 73, 684-696.

Liu, H. C., You, J. X., & Duan, C. Y. (2019). An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. International Journal of Production Economics, 207, 163-172.

Lo, H. W., & Liou, J. J. (2018). A novel multiple-criteria decision-making-based FMEA model for risk assessment. Applied Soft Computing, 73, 684-696.

Nie, R. X., Tian, Z. P., Wang, X. K., Wang, J. Q., & Wang, T. L. (2018). Risk evaluation by FMEA of supercritical water gasification system using multi-granular linguistic distribution assessment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 162, 185-201.

Panchal, D., Singh, A. K., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M. (2019). A new fuzzy methodology-based structured framework for RAM and risk analysis. Applied Soft Computing, 74, 242-254.

Pillay, A., & Wang, J. (2003). Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 79(1), 69–85.

Panchal, D., Mangla, S. K., Tyagi, M., & Ram, M. (2018). Risk analysis for clean and sustainable production in a urea fertilizer industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.

Petrović, G., Mihajlović, J., Ćojbašić, Ž., Madić, M., & Marinković, D. (2019). Comparison of three fuzzy MCDM methods for solving the supplier selection problem. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 17(3), 455-469.

Panchal, D., & Srivastava, P. (2019). Qualitative analysis of CNG dispensing system using fuzzy FMEA–GRA integrated approach. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 10(1), 44-56.

Panchal, D., & Kumar, D. (2017). Risk analysis of compressor house unit in thermal power plant using integrated fuzzy FMEA and GRA approach. International Journal of industrial and systems Engineering, 25(2), 228-250.

Panchal, D., Jamwal, U., Srivastava, P., Kamboj, K., & Sharma, R. (2018). Fuzzy methodology application for failure analysis of transmission system. International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, 12(2), 220-237.

Qin, J., Xi, Y., & Pedrycz, W. (2020). Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) for risk assessment based on interval type-2 fuzzy evidential reasoning method. Applied Soft Computing, 89, 106134.

Ramakrishnan, K. R., & Chakraborty, S. (2020). A cloud topsis model for green supplier selection. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 18(3), 375-397.

Şenel, M., Şenel, B., & Havle, C. A. (2018). Risk analysis of ports in Maritime Industry in Turkey using FMEA based intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. In ITM Web of Conferences (Vol. 22, p. 01018). EDP Sciences.

Su, F. C. F., Huang, Y. J., Rassiah, P., & Salter, B. J. (2020). FMEA-guided transition from microelectron to Flexitron for HDR brachytherapy. Brachytherapy.

Tooranloo, H. S., & Sadat Ayatollah, A. (2016). A model for failure mode and effects analysis based on intuitionistic fuzzy approach. Applied Soft Computing, 49, 238-247.

Xu, Z. (2011). Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(6), 749-760.

Yazdi, M. (2018). Risk assessment based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy-hybrid-modified TOPSIS approach. Safety science, 110, 438-448.

Yazdi, M., Nedjati, A., & Abbassi, R. (2019). Fuzzy dynamic risk-based maintenance investment optimization for offshore process facilities. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 57, 194-207.

Yazdi, M., Korhan, O., & Daneshvar, S. (2020). Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis based on modified fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for fire and explosion in the process industry. International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, 26(2), 319-335.

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338-353.

Zhang, L., Zhan, J., & Yao, Y. (2020). Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method based on CVPIFRS models: an application to biomedical problems. Information Sciences, 517, 315-339.

Zolfani, S., Yazdani, M., Pamucar, D., & Zaraté, P. (2020). A VIKOR and TOPSIS focused reanalysis of the MADM methods based on logarithmic normalization A VIKOR and TOPSIS focused reanalysis of the MADM methods based on logarithmic normalization. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 18(3), 341-355.

Published

2020-12-03

How to Cite

Kushwaha, D. K. ., Panchal, D. ., & Sachdeva, A. (2020). Risk analysis of cutting system under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 1(1), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.31181/rme200101162k